Saturday, June 29, 2013

Swimming Pool Expert Witness Construction and Design Professional

Concrete Slab - Proper Thickness and Placement of Steel Reinforcement

Concrete Slab Thickness

Most structural engineers, building inspectors and contractors do not comply with the published building codes that require minimum slab thicknesses & specific placement of the reinforcing steel. These standards apply to "structural slabs" which are defined as slabs that contain reinforcing steel AND support or transfer loads. Therefore, slabs that bear traffic or weight (e.g. driveways, garage floors, warehouse floors, sidewalk/drive approaches, ANY building slab, etc.) are structural slabs.

The American Concrete Institute (ACI) 318-11 (2011), section 7.7.1 specifies certain slab thickness (dependent upon the thickness of the reinforcement used). It specifies 3 INCHES of concrete between the earth side (regardless if it is soil, sand, gravel, rock or protected by plastic) and 1.5 inches of top coverage - #5 bars (5/8 inch) and smaller, and 2 inches of coverage for #6 - #18 bars (3/4 inch - 2.25 inch).


Remember when determining slab thickness that the bars cross each other - resulting in steel TWICE as thick as a single bar.


Therefore, if you are using #4 bars as reinforcement in your slab, you would have a minimum 5.5 inch slab (3 inches + 0.5 inch steel + 0.5 inch steel + 1.5 inches). Using wire mush is difficult, as you cannot maintain the required placement of the reinforcement within the slab - it bends & deforms too much.


Building Codes - It's the Law!

Don't say that the ACI standards do not apply to your locale.  The ACI Standards are incorporated DIRECTLY into the Uniform Building Code (IBC).  And every state (except Michigan) has adopted the IBC as their base building standard.

IBC 1901.2 states "Plain and reinforced concrete. Structural concrete shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and ACI 318..."

California has the CA Building Code, which is based on the IBC (as usual, CA just made their code more stringent).  A number of other states have done the same to meet regional issues (CO - wild fire protection, snow loads, FL - Hurricanes & Winds, Tidal Surge Areas, etc.).


Supporting the reinforcement


Contractors are NOT ALLOWED to place the reinforcement on the grade and "hook" it (lift the reinforcement into the slab with a hay hook) as they place the cement. After they lift the reinforcement to an arbitrary level, they walk through the wet cement, pushing the reinforcement back to the bottom - where it does absolutely NOTHING. Additionally, hooking frequently pierces the vapor barrier, rendering it worthless.

Concrete blocks or "chairs" must not be space so far apart, that they allow the reinforcing steel to deflect (bow or bend) during concrete placement or as the finishers walk on it. 

ACI 318-11 7.5.1 states "Reinforcing steel shall be accurately placed and adequately supported before concrete is placed, and shall be secured against displacement within tolerances..." 

IBC R506.2.4 states "Reinforcement support. Where provided in slabs on ground, reinforcement shall be supported to remain in place from the center to upper one third of the slab for the duration of the concrete placement."

Vapor Barriers


The plastic placed under a slab is known as a VAPOR RETARDER. It's sole purpose is to prevent capillary action (wicking of moisture) through the slab if it was allowed to remain in direct contact with the soil. Care must be taken to adequately overlap the plastic sheets, seal the seams with waterproof tape and prevent the plastic from punctures. 

Penetrations (pipes, conduits, vents, etc.) through the plastic sheet must be sealed with special cone shaped plastic sheets similar to roof jacks. Notice that the code said "retarder," not "preventer" or "barrier." Some will allow moisture transmission as they may decay over time.

Sand or soil is sometimes placed atop the plastic to absorb the bleed water on the bottom of the slab. The surface of slabs poured directly on plastic will bleed a lot surface water. The perimeter slabs must be elevated to account for the thickness of this material. The support chairs should sit on this material or be of an extended height to allow for it. 


In some areas of the country, these membranes perform multiple tasks, and are installed to also prevent methane or radon gas transmission into the living space. These membranes are made of special materials, require special seam treatments and incorporate under slab venting. Some systems utilize multiple layers of barriers to achieve the required protection.

IBC 2012 R506.2.3 states "Vapor retarder. A 6-mil (0.006 inch; 152 ï½µm) polyethylene or approved vapor retarder with joints lapped not less than 6 inches (152 mm) shall be placed between the concrete floor slab and the base course or the prepared subgrade where no base course exists.
Exception: The vapor retarder may be omitted:
1. From garages, utility buildings and other unheated accessory structures.
2. For unheated storage rooms having an area of less than 70 square feet (6.5 m2) and carports.
3. From driveways, walks, patios and other flatwork not likely to be enclosed and heated at a later date.
4. Where approved by the building official, based on local site conditions."


Proper Grading

The IBC also requires that the earth around the foundation fall away 6" in the first 10 feet, to promote positive site drainage away from the foundation. This also helps prevent water from flowing back under the slab, saturating the base material and causing wicking.


"Turndown" footings can also be added to a flat slab to reinforce the edges, transfer loads and to act as a "cut off wall" for ground water intrusion. These are already incorporated into building foundations as part of the designed load transfer.



Concrete Strength

Though the codes specify 2,500 PSI as the minimum strength for concrete foundations, there are significant benefits and little added cost from using 5000+ PSI concrete.  Added strength, durability,  wear resistance and reduced permeability are all achieved by merely increasing the strength.  Larger aggregates also increase the concrete strength. Most contractors utilize 3/8" aggregate in concrete, because the cost of pumping is a little lower.  3/4" rock is preferred (and is specified by most State Highway Departments), as it yields higher compressive strengths. A 3/4" aggregate and 5,000+ PSI mix and a 3/4" concrete pump is worth the return on your investment.  There is a significant return on the investment of a few thousand dollars.



Concrete Mix Design - Minimizing Water

Most contractors, pump operators and cement truck drivers do not understand "concrete science." 
Concrete only needs enough water to hydrate the cement particles.   

Water makes concrete weaker, by creating microscopic voids in the matrix of the concrete.  When the water evaporates, it leaves microscopic honeycombs behind - weakening the concrete.  

There are "water reducers," super plasticizers and other chemical admixes can reduce the ACTUAL water content required.  They increase the strength, while maintaining the flowability, pumpability and workability of the plastic concrete.  If your concrete contractor or ready-mix supplier does not know about these, find someone else (they have been around for decades!).

AND ABOVE ALL -

DO NOT let the concrete pump operator or cement truck driver add water when the truck arrives at the job site.  By adding water they just weaken your cement, adultering the formulation and mix design!  They are truck drivers and pump operators for a reason... because they are not engineers or concrete/building experts.

Your structural engineer or ready mix plant "mix master" should specify the mix design, based upon strength required, truck travel time, weather conditions, distance to pump & pump type, etc.  They can provide an "allowance" for the addition of some extra water, to be specified in measured gallons.

Paolo Benedetti Aquatic Artist, Watershape Consultant, Expert Witness 
"Creating water as art."™ 
Aquatic Technology Pool and Spa 
©www.aquatictechnology.com

Sunday, June 23, 2013

Swimming Pool Designer Expert Witness VGB Unblockable Drains

There has been a lot of confusion about VGB compliant BLOCKABLE & UNBLOCKABLE DRAIN COVERS.  

While the following national standards pertain to public/commercial pools, we advocate the same standards for residential vessels.  We do not discern a difference between the requirement for a safe hydraulic standards of private VS public/commercial vessels.  We feel that private pools should be just as safe as commercial pools when it comes to suction entrapment and safety.  After all, there are many more private pools than public pools on this planet!
 

While the MAXIMUM INDUSTRY STANDARDS allow 6 FPS, we advocate and promote a MAXIMUM SUCTION LINE VELOCITY OF 4 FPS IN THE TRUNK LINE and 2 FPS MAXIMUM THROUGH A BRANCH SUCTION LINE OR A DRAIN INLET (1 FPS when 1.5 FPS is the maximum standard).


First, let's start with an excerpt from a channel drain cover installation manaul:
 

WATER VELOCITY AND FLOW RATES -
The maximum water velocity through drain covers is limited by some local regulations, for example some state health departments limit the velocity through public pool drain covers to 1½ feet per second. This velocity limit is lower than the flow rating provided by the ANSI/APSP-16 2011 certification, therefore the local limit applies and must be followed. Never exceed the flow rating listed on the cover even if the local code does not provide a velocity limit.


PIPING – GENERAL
For new installations, the piping between drains must be sized to limit the velocity to six feet per second. This limit applies to the
branch piping and all fittings between multiple outlets and the tee leading back to the pump. If code requires a lower water velocity,
comply with the code. See the chart below for information on pipe size flow ratings at six feet per second.


HYDRAULIC SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS -


ACCEPTABLE PIPE SIZE FOR MAXIMUM RECOMMENDED SYSTEM FLOW RATE PER APSP-7 (6 feet/second in the branch line):
Pipe Size                    1½"  2"   2½"   3"   4"
Flow Rate in GPM    45    80   110   160  230 (rounded down)

This is where the confusion lies - blockable drains & un-blockable drains and the relationship of line velocities.

First, Blockable drains:
 

Though a drain cover may be rated for 10,000 GPM, it is REALLY limited by the MAXIMUM LINE VELOCITY of the attached pipes.  On dual drain systems, in the event one drain is blocked, the REMAINING lines must be capable of sustaining 100% of the flow BELOW the 6 FPS maximum.  This means, that during normal operation the flow rate through a "blockable drain" must be 3 FPS or less (when a drain becomes blocked the line velocity through the remaining drain will double). 

BLOCKABLE DRAIN EXAMPLES:

1)  A pump is connected to a 4" trunk line, which is split into (2) 3" branch lines. The 4" line flows 234 GPM @ 6 FPS, while the 3" branch line flows 68 GPM @ 3 FPS. 68 GPM X 2 = 136 GPM.  The maximum flow rate of that system is 136 GPM.  When one drain is blocked the maximum line velocity of the remaining 3" branch line is limited to 136 GPM - therefore that is the MAXIMUM to be drawn through the 4" trunk line.

2)  A pump is connected to a 4" trunk line, which is split into (2) 4" branch lines. The 4" line flows 234 GPM @ 6 FPS, while the 4" branch lines flows 117 GPM @ 3 FPS.  The maximum flow rate of that system is 234 GPM.  When one drain is blocked the maximum line velocity of the remaining 4" branch line is limited to 234 GPM @ 6 FPS - therefore that is the MAXIMUM that may also be drawn through the 4" trunk line as well.

To select a compliant cover, one would merely select a drain cover that is equal to or above the above GPM flow rate at 3 FPS.  If the local standard was 1.5 FPS through the cover, they you'd look for a cover with 2X the GPM flow rating of the above system maximums.
 

THEREFORE, for blockable drains, the maximum line velocity at the pipes connected directly below the cover are limited to 3 FPS maximum (or lower).  In communities with 1.5 FPS standards, the plumbing would have to be split again or upsized to get to 1.5 FPS.

Now, onto UNBLOCKABLE DRAINS:

They are rated using TWO CRITERIA: GPM @ FPS.
Most states limit the FPS flowrate through an UN-BLOCKABLE COVER TO 3 FPS. 
Some states (Texas for example) have lowered the FPS through un-blockable covers to 1.5 FPS.
The rating for an un-blockable cover will look like this: 300 GPM at 3 FPS.
So, if you draw 600 GPM through the cover, the line velocity would be 6 FPS - exceeding the rating of the cover.  150 GPM through the cover, would bring the line velocity down to 1.5 FPS (to comply with states that have de-rated such covers).
 

UN-BLOCKABLE DRAIN EXAMPLES:

1) An un-blockable channel drain is rated at 300 GPM @ 3 FPS.  It is connected to a 4" trunk line, that is split into (2) 2.5" branch lines.  The 2.5" branch lines are connect to 2 inlets on the bottom of the channel drain.
Consider the various maximum limits:
4" pipe: 234 GPM @ 6 FPS
2.5" pipe: 88 GPM @ 6 FPS
Un-blockable Drain Limit: 300 GPM @ 3 FPS
The line velocity of the attached 2.5" pipes are the limiting factors @ 88 GPM each X 2 = 176 GPM.
The maximum flowrate of this system is 176 GPM.

2) An un-blockable channel drain is rated at 300 GPM @ 3 FPS.  It is connected to a 4" trunk line & manifold, that is split into (3) 2.5" branch lines.  The 2.5" branch lines connect to 3 inlets on the bottom of the channel drain.
Consider the various maximum limits:
4" pipe: 234 GPM @ 6 FPS
2.5" pipe: 88 GPM @ 6 FPS
Un-blockable Drain Limit: 300 GPM @ 3 FPS
Though the line velocity of the (3) attached 2.5" pipes would allow 264 GPM (e.g. 88 GPM each X 3 = 264 GPM), that would exceed the maximum line velocity of the 4" trunk line at 234 GPM. 
The maximum flowrate of this system is 234 GPM @ 6 FPS.

3) An un-blockable channel drain is rated at 300 GPM @ 3 FPS.  It is connected to a 4" trunk line & manifold, that is split into (2) 2.5" branch lines.  The 2.5" branch lines connect to 2 inlets on the bottom of the channel drain.  However, the local authority's standard specifies 1.5 FPS for un-blockable drains.
Consider the various maximum limits:
4" pipe: 234 GPM @ 6 FPS
2.5" pipe: 88 GPM @ 6 FPS
Un-blockable Drain Limit: 150 GPM @ > 1.5 FPS < (a slower standard).
Though the line velocity of the (2) attached 2.5" pipes would allow 176 GPM (e.g. 88 GPM each X 2 = 176 GPM), that would exceed the maximum rating of the un-blockable cover at 1.5 FPS of 150 GPM. 
The maximum flowrate of this system is 150 GPM. 
Sidenote: the trunk line could not be downsized to 3", because 150 GPM would exceed 6 FPS in a 3" pipe.

4) An un-blockable channel drain is rated at 316 GPM @ 3.9 FPS when floor mounted.  It is connected to a 4" trunk line & manifold, that is split into (3) 2.5" branch lines.  The 2.5" branch lines connect to 3 inlets on the bottom of the channel drain.  However, the local authority's standard specifies 3 FPS for un-blockable drains (therefore, we must solve for the GPM rating at 3 FPS).
Consider the various maximum limits:
4" pipe: 234 GPM @ 6 FPS
2.5" pipe: 88 GPM @ 6 FPS
Un-blockable Drain Limit: XXX GPM @ > 3 FPS
316 GPM ÷ 3.9 FPS = 81 GPM/1 FPS
81 GPM X 3 GPM (our standard in this case) = 243 GPM @ 3 FPS
Though the line velocity of the (3) attached 2.5" pipes would allow 264 GPM (e.g. 88 GPM each X 3 = 264 GPM),
and the limit through the drain cover would allow 243 GPM @ 3 FPS,
BOTH OF THOSE FLOWRATES would exceed the maximum line velocity of the 4" trunk line at 234 GPM. 
Therefore, the maximum flowrate of this system is 234 GPM @ 6 FPS.
 

Note the differences in line velocities of the piping attached to bloackable VS un-blockable drains:

Blockable Covers: 

The maximum line velocity at the pipe connected below the cover is limited to 3 FPS.
Un-blockable Covers: 

The maximum line velocity at the pipe connected below the cover is limited to 6 FPS.

While these are the MAXIMUM INDUSTRY STANDARDS, we advocate and promote a MAXIMUM LINE VELOCITY OF 4 FPS IN THE TRUNK LINE and 2 FPS MAXIMUM THROUGH A BRANCH LINE OR A DRAIN INLET (1 FPS when 1.5 FPS is the maximum).
 

Hopefully, through these examples, you have come to realize that JUST BECAUSE A COVER HAS A MANUFACTURER'S "FLOW RATING," it is the ATTACHED PIPING SYSTEM THAT DICTATES the MAXIMUM GPM through a plumbing system.
 

Paolo Benedetti 
Aquatic Artist, Watershape Consultant, Expert Witness 
"Creating water as art."™ 
Aquatic Technology Pool and Spa 
©www.aquatictechnology.com

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Swimming Pool Designs must be ADA Compliant

Expert Witness - Swimming Pool & Spa, Americans with Disabilities Act

The ADA requires that swimming pools be designed to allow a person with disabilities to enter and exit the swimming pool or spa, on their own and without the assistance of others.

This is easily achieved through the installation of a lift.  Lifts are electric, hydraulic or battery powered.  They must be in place and available for use at all times.  They are UGLY and can potentially become an obstruction on the pool deck, in violation of other portions of the ADA.

The alternative is an innovative design, that allows the person with disabilities to walk or roll right into the water.  It is a ramp or beach entry, that gently slopes into the water.  This is aesthetically pleasing and a creative solution to the hideous deck mounted chair or sling lifts.

 
Paolo Benedetti 
Aquatic Artist, Watershape Consultant, Expert Witness 
"Creating water as art."™ 
Aquatic Technology Pool and Spa 
©www.aquatictechnology.com