Monday, December 23, 2013

Swimming Pool Design

Why you need an expert swimming pool designer...

Value
A swimming pool designer will interview you and determine your needs, your changing lifestyle and your entertainment style.  They will plan and prepare your project for future modifications to accommodate those changes in the project's use.

Creativity
A designer can offer ideas and options that a salesman simply cannot.  If something is not on a company's menu, a salesman is not going to offer it.  Salesmen that attempt to deliver features that are out of their normal realm, more than likely they will not work properly.  I have seen a vanishing edge promised by salesmen to be a cascading waterfall, become nothing more than a spraying basin overshooting mess.

Money Savings
How can spending money on a swimming pool designer save me money?  Nothing is left for interpretation.  Thorough plans ensure that there is nothing omitted from the bids, that change orders are minimal and that the structural engineer has a clear picture of the intent.

Future modifications in the project, to meet lifestyle or use changes, can be incorporated.  This foresight can literally save you thousands of dollars by not having to rip out prior work that you paid good money for.

 
Paolo Benedetti, SWD Aquatic Artist, Watershape Consultant, Expert Witness, International Construction Management 
Contact the author at: info@aquatictechnology.com or 408-776-8220 
"Creating water as art."™ 
Aquatic Technology Pool and Spa© 
©www.aquatictechnology.com All rights reserved.

Sunday, December 8, 2013

Glass Mosaic Tile Expert Witness Discolorations

You paid a pretty penny for the installation of glass tile mosaic in your swimming pool, spa, watershape or fountain.  Now you're seeing a discoloration behind the tiles.  

The installer it telling you that it's normal or from airborne mold spores during installation.  But you have doubts... and you are correct in your suspicions.

Source of Discolorations

Most discolorations are the result of installation errors.  They can be from any of the following installation mistakes:
  • using gray cements or setting materials
  • not keeping the tiles shaded until the pool is filled
  • not protecting the work from rain or irrigation water
  • allowing the bond coat to skin over (poor bond, voids)
  • too thin of a bondcoat
  • excess water in the bondcoat
  • incorrectly using the direct set (two step) installation method
  • leaving trowel marks
  • grouting too soon (not allowing the bondcoat to fully cure)
  • filling the pool too soon after grouting
  • fielding mixing setting materials (results in unknown sheer and compression strengths, density and permeability)
  • not using a waterproof membrane
  • too thin of a bondcoat (allowing the membrane to shadow through)
  • allowing ground water to soak through the pool shell
These are just some of the most common mistakes.  Individually or in combination, they can result in a beautiful pool turning into a hideous mess.

Industry Standards

Regardless of what the installation method your installer or the tile manufacturer recommends, there are acceptable industry standards.

Many foreign manufacturers are not aware that the tile industry in North America has performed significant testing and analysis if glass tile mosaic installation practices.  They have established acceptable methods of installing glass tile mosaics that apply to EVERY INSTALLATION in North America.  They are the GOSPEL for glass tile installations.

These practices are published under the ANSI A108.14, A108.15 and A108.16: Standards for the Installation of Glass Tile Mosaics.  They also make direct reference to the quality and performance standards for the required mortar beds, waterproof membranes, bondcoats (thinsets) and grouts.

The field mixing of mortar beds and setting materials cannot guarantee that they meet the ANSI performance standards.

Paolo Benedetti, SWD Aquatic Artist, Watershape Consultant, Expert Witness, International Construction Management 
Contact the author at: 
info@aquatictechnology.com or 408-776-8220 
"Creating water as art."™ 
Aquatic Technology Pool and Spa© 
©www.aquatictechnology.com All rights reserved.

Saturday, November 30, 2013

Swimming pool bonding: A matter of Life & Death


Testing a swimming pool bonding grid

Required tools

An analog ohmmeter (meter with a needle, not digital). Available at Home Depot for $10.
A roll of wire (long enough to reach from the pool equipment pad to the furthest point to be tested)
Alligator clamps (attached to each end of the roll of wire)

Testing Procedure
STEP 1 - "Zero out" (calibrate) the meter:
Attach one of the ohmmeter leads to an alligator clamp that is on one end of the wire. Attach the other alligator clamp to the other ohmmeter lead.  The meter will display a measurement (it is measuring the resistance of the roll of wire).  Use the calibration dial to return the needle to zero.  You are now ready to start.

STEP 2 - Testing
Disconnect one alligator clip from the meter and attach it to an exposed bonding at the equipment pad.  Use the probe without the alligator clip to take readings of various metallic components, but touching it to them.  The needle should remain close to zero.
remember, if you are measuring the Ohms of resistance using the 10X scale, every reading is multiplied by 10 to get the true resistance.  There should be no need to use the 100X scale.

The following items should read zero ohms of resistance:
  • Pool Heater
  • Pool Pumps 
  • Any piece of pool equipment that is metal
  • Pool Controller (or time clock box)
  • Related circuit panels
  • The internal grounding bar of all pool light junction boxes.
  • The external bonding lug of the light junction box.
  • The metal parts of the diving board, slide, deck anchors, umbrella sleeve, fountain heads, spillways, waterfalls, etc.
  • Anything containing over 4 square inches of metal that is within 5 feet of the pool (in any direction): downspouts, hand railings, steel in the pool deck concrete, window frames, skimmer lids, deck drains, pool cover tracks, pool cover lids, etc. 
  • Swimming pool light niches can only be tested with the water removed from the pool.  When installed the stainless steel (SS) light fixture's face ring should read zero.  The following parts should also all read ZERO: 
  • The SS straps inside of a plastic light niche.
  •  The body of a SS niche.  

If these components show any resistance other than ZERO their bonding is corrupt.  More than likely the bonding wire is not securely connected or the continuity is broken between the niche, the junction box and the equipment pad.

BONDING is a matter of life and death.

Paolo Benedetti, SWD Aquatic Artist, Watershape Consultant, Expert Witness, International Construction Management 
Contact the author at: 
info@aquatictechnology.com or 408-776-8220 
"Creating water as art."™ 
Aquatic Technology Pool and Spa© 
©www.aquatictechnology.com 
All rights reserved.

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

Minimum Shotcrete Strengths Pools Watershapes

Shotcrete Strengths for Swimming Pools

The minimum compressive strength for shotcrete (wet mix or dry mix method) shall be 4000 PSI.  The minimum compressive strength of the concrete is fc’=4,000 psi with a maximum water-cementitious material ratio (w/cm) of 0.50.
  
American Concrete Institute
 
The American Concrete Institute’s ACI 318-08 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete includes Chapter 4 Durability Requirements. Also contained therein are two applicable tables:
Table 4.2.2 specifies the Requirements for Special Exposure Conditions. 
Table 4.3.1 Requirements for Concrete by Exposure Class defines a Category P1 exposure as concrete “in contact with water where low permeability is required.”   


American Shotcrete Association

The  American Shotcrete Association has also stated that their approved minimum compressive strength shall be 4,000 psi (as stated in the their Position Statement #1).

International Building Code

The IBC also specifies 4000 PSI shotcrete, by making direct reference to the ACI 318 standard.

The IBC (2012) 1910.6 Rebound Removal, also states that all rebound and trimmings shall be removed from the structure.
 
Therefore, all rebound, trimmings and loose debris shall be removed from the structure and shall not be used in any manner within the structure.


Paolo Benedetti, SWD Aquatic Artist, Watershape Consultant, Expert Witness, International Construction Management 
Contact the author at: info@aquatictechnology.com or 408-776-8220
"Creating water as art."™ 
Aquatic Technology Pool and Spa© 
©www.aquatictechnology.com All rights reserved.

Sunday, October 20, 2013

Limiting Suction Outlet Plumbing Velocities


Standards Mandate the MAXIMUM SPEED LIMIT
 
Standards dictate that the MAXIMUM velocity limit in the plumbing at the suction outlets is 6 feet-per-second (ANSI/APSP-7).  I recommend that the maximum designed velocity on the suction side of the pump be limited to 4 feet-per-second.

Why lower that the maximum?  In suction lines speed is not a good thing.  In fact, excessive speed causes equipment wear, friction, lost energy and pump noise.

Since pump selection is the last task performed when designing a suction system, oftentimes there is not a pump curve that EXACTLY fits the system requirements.  By designing below the maximum allowed velocity, the designer has the ability to select the closest pump curve, even if it slightly exceeds the 4 FPS design - safely remaining below the maximum.

Isolation Valves 

When isolation valves are placed in suction lines between a pump and the suction outlets, any singular suction line supplying water to the pump MUST be capable of providing 100% of the systems’ designed flow rate at a maximum line velocity of 4.5 FPS.  

This is required, because if valves are closed and lines are improperly isolated, and if the pipes are not of sufficient diameter, the line velocity would quickly exceed the 6 FPS standard.

Energy Efficiency


Energy efficiency is greatly enhanced by lowering the line velocity.  Cavitation, operating noises & suction entrapment hazards are also reduced by lowering the line velocity.

Line velocities cannot be reduced much lower than 4 FPS, otherwise pipe scour would not occur.  Debris and sediment could eventually collect in the pipes.

Paolo Benedetti, SWD Aquatic Artist, Watershape Consultant, Expert Witness, International Construction Management 
Contact the author at: info@aquatictechnology.com or 408-776-8220 
"Creating water as art."™ 
Aquatic Technology Pool and Spa© 
©www.aquatictechnology.com All rights reserved.

Thursday, October 10, 2013

Salt Water Pools Galvanic Corrosion

The current rave is have a "salt water" pool.  Many owners are under the false impression that these pools are "chlorine free."  Though, this is hardly the case.

Electrolytic Solution

Salt is placed into the pool to create a solution much weaker than that found in the ocean.  In fact there should only be about 3,000 ppm of salt present in a salt water pool.  A special device at the equipment pad, then splits the sodium chloride (salt) into CHLORINE!  These owners are merely using the salt to generate chlorine in their pipes!

But placing salt into the pool also turns the pool water into a electrolytic solution.  Add some stray current and the pool becomes in effect a giant electroplating tank.

A salt water pool is really a very weak, but giant battery!

Galvanic Corrosion

These stray currents will cause staining of the plaster surfaces, galvanic corrosion of less noble metals.  Copper heat exchangers will actually dissolve from the inside and decay on the outside, as their molecular structure is attacked.  Metals suspended in the pool water will bond to more noble metals, plating them in unusual colors.

Sacrificial Anode

Many in the pool industry have drawn on "a solution" that boat owners have used for years - SACRIFICIAL ANODES.  HOWEVER, a SACRIFICIAL ANODE is not the placebo everyone is seeking. 

On a boat, a sailor does not care if the anode erodes, or if the anode's metals dissolve into the water (ocean).  The anode on a boat is a lot cheaper than the wiring, an expensive bronze prop or brass components.  It prevents the corrosion of the boat's precious components, by SACRIFICING itself instead. 

Placing a sacrificial anode in a swimming pool is doing the same thing as on a boat.  One is merely offering a SACRIFICIAL metal for the galvanic corrosion to attack, instead of the precious components.  It does nothing to address the actual cause - GALVANIC CORROSION.

So instead of plating surfaces with copper, you will be plating them with zinc or magnesium from the sacrificial anode.  The sacrificial anode will save the copper, but it will not stop the staining or plating of the stainless steel components.  That will now occur with the metal from the anode.  


This is exactly why anodes need to be periodically replaced - they are sacrificed.  And where those sacrificed metals go is out of your control!

The Source of Stray Current


The equipotential bonding grid does not prevent galvanic corrosion.  In fact, if there is stray voltage finding it's way to the pool through the property's CONTINUOUS GROUNDING SYSTEM, the equipotential bonding grid may actually be feeding voltage to the pool's metallic components. 

The bonding grid can actually function as either the electrode or cathode, depending if there is stray voltage present or if it is providing a path to ground (where the equipotential bonding grid and the grounding grids are cross connected - pumps, heater's, panel boards, etc).

For these very reasons, many pool builders that I know and I, have ceased installing salt systems.  We now promote "off-line" on-site generation of liquid chlorine from salt or tanks of liquid chlorine and then the controlled dispensing via a ORP/pH Controller.



Paolo Benedetti, SWD Aquatic Artist, Watershape Consultant, Expert Witness, International Construction Management 
Contact the author at: info@aquatictechnology.com or 408-776-8220 
"Creating water as art."™ 
Aquatic Technology Pool and Spa© 
©www.aquatictechnology.com 
All rights reserved.

Monday, September 9, 2013

Aqua Design International Projects

Aqua designs for international projects require specialized training and knowledge.

International Codes

Many international locations have few, if any, aqua design codes or standards.  So what codes should apply?

In this litigious society we live in, designers should do their best to comply with the most stringent published code.  Most of those codes reside right here in the United States.  The leader for commercial pool standards is the State of California.

Avoiding Litigation

If the designer is based in the United States, a reasonable line of legal questioning in foreign litigation would be:

"Are you trained to design and build projects that are compliant with the more stringent US codes and standards?"
"In the absence of local regulations or building codes, wouldn't it be prudent to design and build to those same margins of safety?"
"So, by not designing to those same US standards, you are saying that a life in this foreign country is worth less than a life in the US?"

Keep in mind that in many foreign countries, errors and omissions are often construed as criminal negligence.  A designer may not just be trying to avoid financial losses, but jail as well.

Bottom Line

When designing foreign projects, it is best to design a project to be in compliance with the most stringent standards or codes that exist, unless they are in direct conflict with a local regulation.

The standards established by the ADA, IBC, NEC, ISPSC, APSP, NSF, ACI, TCNA, ANSI and VGBSA may not be the adopted code in a foreign locale.  However, these standards were established for a reason - life safety and user convenience.  

Don't the people in foreign countries deserve the same levels of protection?


Paolo Benedetti, SWD - Aquatic Artist, Watershape Consultant, Expert Witness, International Aquatic Designer and Builder
Contact the author at: info@aquatictechnology.com or 408-776-8220 
"Creating water as art."™ 
Aquatic Technology Pool and Spa©
©www.aquatictechnology.com All rights reserved.

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Full-Time Swimming Pool Expert Witness

Should you hire a full-time swimming pool expert witness or someone who is still active in the business who is a part-time expert witness?

Out of Touch

That's a rather straight forward question with an obvious answer.  A "professional" expert witness has retired from the business.  They spend all of their time examining projects, writing reports and providing testimony.

So how do they stay up to date with the current trends in the industry?
How do they learn about the innovations in construction techniques?
Where do they get exposed to the new products that make past technologies obsolete?
When did they last actually build something utilizing state of the art methods?
What was the last project that they actually designed or engineered?
How do they stay up to date on the newest codes, industry standards and acceptable trade practices?

The longer they have been a full-time expert witness, the longer they have been out of touch with the industry.  Though they may be able to stay up to date on the broad scope of changes, the nuances of change pass them by.

In-Touch

Those that are part-time expert witnesses, usually have full-time jobs actually designing, consulting, managing or constructing swimming pools.

Because they are active in the industry, they are current on all of the standards, codes and acceptable trade practices.  Because they are on the leading edge of design innovation, they are up to date with the technological changes and techniques required to execute these new designs.

The expert witness you need to hire, is one who is still practicing in the industry.  Someone who is out in the trenches, resolving design issues and building projects on a daily basis.


Contact the author at: info@aquatictechnology.com or 408-776-8220 
Paolo Benedetti Aquatic Artist, Watershape Consultant, Expert Witness 
"Creating water as art."™ 
Aquatic Technology Pool and Spa 
©www.aquatictechnology.com All rights reserved.

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Expert witness swimming pools ADA Compliance

Expert witness discovers that "ADA Compliant" products are not always ADA compliant.

Don't take their word for it...

While designing a project for a disabled Veteran, I was asked to specify an outdoor shower for use after workouts, laboring in the yard and swimming.

I began to research outdoor showers and discovered that there are many models that are labeled "ADA Compliant."  I downloaded the specifications and sat back with an cold glass of iced tea for some rather boring reading.

Being familiar with the ADA codes, I soon realized that almost every one of these outdoor shower products were falsely advertized as being "ADA Compliant."  They in fact, were only partially complaint.

Know the codes

The outdoor showers were only partially ADA Compliant.... they merely had ADA Compliant handles on the water valves and lower shower heads.  Convenient yes, but they had omitted a major safety factor.

Temperature modulation and temperature limits are a mandatory feature of ADA Compliant showers.  If a shower gets scalding hot, a disabled person cannot jump out of the water and scream, "OH, $%&#  !"  Someone who is paralyzed might not even feel the burning water.

Liability

If you are selecting products for a project, it is imperative that you know the codes that apply to those products.  Simply relying upon a manufacturer's label of ADA Compliance can result in the specifier or installer assuming a lot of liability in the even someone is injured.

It helps to know the codes!

Paolo Benedetti Aquatic Artist, Watershape Consultant, Expert Witness 
"Creating water as art."™ 
Aquatic Technology Pool and Spa ©www.aquatictechnology.com

Monday, August 12, 2013

Soils Reports and Project Structural Engineering are the law

Swimming pool expert witness explains why soils reports and project specific structural engineering are required by law (the building codes).

Structural Engineering 


Swimming pools must be designed to withstand any force that will be exerted upon the structure.  These forces are called "surcharges."  The leading surcharge on an in-ground pool are the soils surrounding the pool itself.

Soils

The soils must be able to support the structure and prevent movement.  Soil conditions can very from lot to lot in the same subdivision.

For example, these soils can be expansive, non-supportive, prone to sliding or vertical uplift or subject to liquifaction.

One cannot ascertain the characteristics of the underlying soils by looking at the top soil.  That is unless they are Superman with x-ray vision.

Structural Engineer needs a soils report

A structural engineer cannot design the structure, without knowing the characteristics of the underlying soils.

Therefore, they need a soils report to tell them what site conditions are present.

Required by Law (Building Codes)

The 2012 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code states:
802.1 Materials of components and accessories.
The materials of components and accessories used for permanent inground residential swimming pools shall be suitable for the environment in which they are installed. The materials shall be capable of fulfilling the design, installation and the intended use requirements in the International Residential Code.
802.2 Structural design.

The structural design and materials shall be in accordance with the International Residential Code.  


The International Residential Code goes into further depth as to the requirement for project specific engineering, soils reports, minimum concrete strengths, foundation requirements, shotcrete strengths, rebar installation, special inspectors, laboratory testing, etc.

Since the 2012 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code has been incorporated into the International Building Code, which is THE building code for the entire United States... it has defacto become the swimming pool code for the United States.  

The Swimming Pool Code's counter reference to the IBC and IRC places a lot of additional minimum specifications and requirements on the construction of a concrete swimming pool or spa (gunite/shotcrete).

It helps to know the law.


Paolo Benedetti 
Aquatic Artist, Watershape Consultant, Expert Witness 
"Creating water as art."™ 
Aquatic Technology Pool and Spa ©www.aquatictechnology.com

Thursday, August 1, 2013

Swimming Pool Concrete Compressive Strengths

http://aquatictechnology.com/pool-designer-services.htm

Some expert witnesses are confused by the terms "permeable" & "waterproof" as they relate to concrete.

Waterproof VS Permeability

Increased concrete densities provide for stronger structures, for which I am an advocate.  However, increased densities ONLY REDUCE concrete's permeability, they DO NOT render it impermeable (waterproof).

Experts need to stop claiming that higher psi concrete's are WATERPROOF - THEY ARE NOT !  Yes, they ARE less permeable, but water will still weep through the concrete - just at a slower rate.

None of the following references (all in my personal library) state that higher density concretes are waterproof:

Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318M-08)
Steel Reinforced Concrete Structures, Mohamed A. El-Reedy (2008)
Reinforced Concrete Designers Handbook, 10th Ed Reynold & Steedman
Engineering Concrete Mix Designs & Test Methods, Irving, 1999
Advanced Concrete Technology Vol. #1 Constituent Materials, Newman & Choo, 2003
Advanced Concrete Technology Vol. #3 Processes, Newman & Choo, 2003
Advanced Concrete Technology Vol. #4 Testing & Quality, Newman & Choo, 2003
ACI 201.2R-01 Guide to Durable Concrete
Reinforced Concrete Design Theory & Examples, Macginley, 2003
Masonry and Concrete for Residential Construction, Beall, 2004
ASTM Steel Handbook, 3rd Ed, Bringas, 2002
Reinforcement for Concrete — Materials & Applications, ACI Educational Bulletin #2, 2006
ACI 506R - Guide to Shotcrete


Other Standards REQUIRE additional protection

Though one may be comfortable with the low permeability of 9,000 psi concrete, other trade standards specify the use of waterproof membranes (e.g. TCNA, CTIOA).   Ignoring these other standards is as egregious as shooting a 2,500 psi pool shell!


Both TCNA and CTIOA require additional waterproofing measures under tile in vessels, tubs, showers, etc.  Until those standards are repealed or modified, one cannot simply chose to ignore them.

Special Protections

The mere use of high density concrete does not provide protection from hydrogen sulfide or chloride corrosion of the concrete.


Protection from these ravages of nature can only be provided with special mix designs, concretes, admixtures and/or waterproof membranes.

The currently accepted ACI permeability tests have inherent flaws.  The chloride ion penetration test (ASTM C1202) does not measure how rapidly the ions penetrate the concrete.  Nor does the test account for variations in hydrostatic pressures, a variable that increases the permeability as the hydrostatic pressures increase.  This is why this test is only used to test mix designs in a laboratory. 
 

Through proper mix design and compressive strengths, one can deliver a low value of chloride ion penetration.  However, there is no test available that allows one to demonstrate the in place chloride ion resistance.  This testing is beyond the scope of the current ACI 318, which is the controlling document of most Building Codes and the IBC. 

Waterproofing is a required trade practice

WATERPROOFING is also required to protect concrete and it's steel reinforcement from sulfates, hydrogen sulfide and chloride degradation.  To prevent water from permeating through concrete basements and subterranean structures, waterproofing is oftentimes applied to the soils prior to the placement of reinforcement or to the outside of subterranean concrete structure prior to back-filling.   

Just because a swimming pool has water intentionally added to the interior of the structure, does that mean that we do not have a duty to protect the concrete from the permeation of water from BOTH sides of the structure?

Paolo Benedetti 
Aquatic Artist, Watershape Consultant, Expert Witness 
"Creating water as art."™ 
Aquatic Technology Pool and Spa 
©www.aquatictechnology.com

Friday, July 26, 2013

Swimming Pool Designs Fixed Price Package

How can anyone provide a pre-designed swimming pool for a fixed price?  There are just too many variables...

Every site is different

How can the pricing model hold true for every property?  There are just too many variables...
The soil conditions vary from lot to lot in the same neighborhood and the required strength of the concrete shell will vary significantly.
Access to property and the required excavation equipment will differ.
The distance to the dump site for the dirt spoils varies, as do the fuel and trucking costs.
The size of properties and setback limitations are different.
The lines of sites from the owners & neighbors property differ.
Existing utilities and locations vary and may require upgrading or longer installation runs.

Generic Engineering


The structural engineering used on these projects is a generic, a one size fits all plan.  They meet the MINIMAL requirements, but are not guaranteed to meet the conditions for your site.

How can they do this?  Because most building departments do not enforce the International Building Code requirement that the structural engineering be designed to overcome the surcharges placed upon the structure.  Some cities (Los Angeles for example) require soils reports with swimming pool plans and structural engineering.  They require that the soils engineer review the structural plans to ensure that the engineering meets his minimum requirements.

Simply put, the swimming pool must be strong enough to prevent structural failure (cracking) from loads placed upon the shell.  These loads come from adjacent structures & buildings, up or down slopes, retaining walls, winds, snow, saturated soils, expansive soils, uplifting soils, seismic events, surf or tides - anything that will place a force on the pool.

Generic structural engineering is totally worthless, if the structural engineer has not reviewed the site and a soils report (geotechnical investigation).  The structural engineer simply cannot validate the strength requirements without a soils report that defines the conditions below the surface.  

These "package" price pools totally disregard the strength requirement, by placating homeowners with a pool builder's own "structural warranty."  This warranty does not warrant the pool against cracking - only that the pool will "hold water."  That means when the pool does crack, they will patch only the crack - thereby restoring the watertightness.  And, when they patch the crack, they will not repair the plaster surface.  

Would you accept cracking of your home's foundation, a dam above you in a canyon or a bridge you drive on?  Of course not, but they seem to think that this is acceptable.

Price Changes

You want a site specific structural engineering?  That's extra!
You don't want the pool equipment 10 feet from the pool?  That's extra!
You want to change the shape of the pool or steps?  That's extra.
You want something other than white plaster?  That's extra?
Oh, you wanted the spa heated?  A heater is extra.
You want a gas line to feed fuel to the heater?  That's extra too.
You want a tile other that the 6 blue tiles we offer?  That's extra.
Oh, you want remote controls of the pool & spa?  That's extra too!
You want drains in the pool deck?  Those are extra?

It is the old bait and switch routine to which we all try to avoid.

Remember, YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR!

Paolo Benedetti 
Aquatic Artist, Watershape Consultant, Expert Witness 
"Creating water as art."™ 
Aquatic Technology Pool and Spa 
©www.aquatictechnology.com

Saturday, July 20, 2013

Swimming Pool Design Expert Witness - ADA compliant designs

Swimming Pool designs and ADA complaint designs do not need to be sterile and utilitarian.

ADA Compliance

Though the codes are very explicit as to the design requirements of an ADA compliant facility, a little creativeness can eliminate the sterile and utilitarian designs most frequently associated with handicapped accessible swimming pools.

Getting Creative

Beach entries and ramps are the easiest means to eliminate unsightly lifts and chairs.  Beach entries look the best on natural or lagoon type of pools.  

However, the slope is much less for ADA compliant ramps - 1 foot of drop for every 12 feet of length (as opposed to normal beach entry slopes of 1 in 7).  This would require a minimum of 36 feet of sloped beach to reach a 3 foot depth.  the code also requires that ramps over 30 feet in length at a 1 in 12 slope, have an intermediary landing.  In addition to these space requirements, the ramp needs be even longer, so it can start above the waterline.  

Wide beach type of entries are not required to have handrails.  However, a narrow ramp for access into a pool would require handrails and curbs at ADA specified heights and widths.

If the slope is anything greater than 1 in 20, then a landing is required at the top and bottom.  The pool deck and a flat area at the bottom of the ramp (pool floor) can satisfy these requirements.

However, the ramp need only terminate in 24 to 30 inches of water - enough for the bather to become bouyant.

Design Alternatives
 
The easiest means to provide for access without dedicating a lot of real estate to ramps or beach entries, is through the incorporation of a "transition wall."  This design element raises the pool wall 16 to 19 inches above the grade.  

It allows the disabled person to sit on the wall or to transfer from the wheel chair to the raised bench.  From there, it is merely a matter of swinging around into the pool.  

This design requires that the elevation of the pool deck drop on one side of the pool, usually not a difficult obstacle.

Visually, it is unobtrusive and a lot more pleasant to look at than a stainless steel tower and plastic chair.

Design - creating elements that work in harmony with their environment.
  
Paolo Benedetti 
Aquatic Artist, Watershape Consultant, Expert Witness 
"Creating water as art."™ 
Aquatic Technology Pool and Spa 
©www.aquatictechnology.com

Thursday, July 18, 2013

Expert Witness evaluation of swimming pool construction project

An expert witness evaluation of a troubled construction project entails many steps...

What was promised...

A review of all of the written communications between the contractor and owner is the first step.  Verbal promises are a debate that will rage for eons and don't hold much water.

The expert will want to review:
bids
proposals
contracts
change orders
emails
contractor conceptual drawings and plans
structural engineering
project specifications
images taken during construction
owner punchlist and builder responses
permits
inspection correction notices

What was delivered...

Next the expert will want to perform a site inspection.  They will evaluate the project, comparing the finished project to the contract, engineering and plans and to industry workmanship standards.

This stage can take anywhere from a few hours to weeks.  Sometimes previously undisclosed items are discovered.  On other occasions, a specialized expert is called in to evaluate specific issues.  These can be geologists, electrical engineers or structural engineers.  If the quality of the construction materials is in question, a testing laboratory might remove samples for analysis.

Written Evaluation

The written evaluation will outline the issues, possible causes, the standard or code that was to be met and suggestions for remediation.

While some issues are easily remedied, some required extensive structural repairs.  When the cost of repair exceeds or approaches the cost of removal and replacement, most judicial bodies will opt for the reconstruction of the entire project.

Expert's Responsibility

The expert's responsibility is not to the person paying the bills - it is to revealing the truth.  The facts are the facts and the cards fall where they may.  It is merely the expert's job to report their findings, whether positive or negative for their client.  

You can't twist the truth - unless you're a politician!

Paolo Benedetti 
Aquatic Artist, Watershape Consultant, Expert Witness 
"Creating water as art."™ 
Aquatic Technology Pool and Spa 
©www.aquatictechnology.com

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Swimming Pool Expert Witness Construction & Design

Expert Witness - Swimming Pools, Construction & Design
National Electrical Code - Section 680 Swimming Pools & Spas


The electrician didn't understand why I disapproved of this installation...
There were many things wrong:

  • Indoor rated CAT 5 Cable was installed in underground conduits.  Underground or Direct Burial cables should be used, as they contain a silicone gel to prevent water intrusion.
  • The metal gutters are not specifically designed for swimming pool lighting junction boxes, and were utilized for the underwater lighting.  These non-compliant boxes are not equipped with the required corded strain relief, grounding bar or the internal and external bonding connections.  ONLY fixtures specially designed for this purpose may be utilized for underwater fixtures [NEC 680.24(A)(1), NEC 680.24(D)], IRC4106.8.5, IRC4106.8.1].
  • The metal gutters were not properly supported, protected from damage or waterproof.
  • Bare #8 copper bonding wires do not connect the exterior of the box to the bonding grid [NEC 680.24].
  • A stranded green #8 copper bonding wire is not contained within the PVC conduits from the Pentair Panel terminal bars to the pool light junction box terminal bars [NEC 680.24(F)].
  • Stranded green #8 copper wires are not contained within the PVC conduit between the pool light niche and the gutters.  The #8 copper wire connection inside of the light niche must be encapsulated in an approved potting compound [NEC 680.23(B)] .
  • All grounding and bonding connections in a swimming pool installation MUST connect to a terminal bar or equipment bonding lug – wire nut connections are not permitted on grounding or bonding wires [NEC 680.24(F)].  
      They are just TOO IMPORTANT TO COME LOOSE!
  • Non-pool light circuits may not share pool lighting conduits unless they are GFCI protected [NEC 680.23(F)].
  • Low voltage and high voltage wiring are contained within the same panels, conduits and junction boxes – data wiring inside of conduits with high voltage electrical conductors [NEC 800-52].
His question... "What's your problem?

Oh, only a minor detail of potentially killing people in their swimming pool.

Paolo Benedetti 
Aquatic Artist, Watershape Consultant, Expert Witness 
"Creating water as art."™ 
Aquatic Technology Pool and Spa©
www.aquatictechnology.com

Saturday, June 29, 2013

Swimming Pool Expert Witness Construction and Design Professional

Concrete Slab - Proper Thickness and Placement of Steel Reinforcement

Concrete Slab Thickness

Most structural engineers, building inspectors and contractors do not comply with the published building codes that require minimum slab thicknesses & specific placement of the reinforcing steel. These standards apply to "structural slabs" which are defined as slabs that contain reinforcing steel AND support or transfer loads. Therefore, slabs that bear traffic or weight (e.g. driveways, garage floors, warehouse floors, sidewalk/drive approaches, ANY building slab, etc.) are structural slabs.

The American Concrete Institute (ACI) 318-11 (2011), section 7.7.1 specifies certain slab thickness (dependent upon the thickness of the reinforcement used). It specifies 3 INCHES of concrete between the earth side (regardless if it is soil, sand, gravel, rock or protected by plastic) and 1.5 inches of top coverage - #5 bars (5/8 inch) and smaller, and 2 inches of coverage for #6 - #18 bars (3/4 inch - 2.25 inch).


Remember when determining slab thickness that the bars cross each other - resulting in steel TWICE as thick as a single bar.


Therefore, if you are using #4 bars as reinforcement in your slab, you would have a minimum 5.5 inch slab (3 inches + 0.5 inch steel + 0.5 inch steel + 1.5 inches). Using wire mush is difficult, as you cannot maintain the required placement of the reinforcement within the slab - it bends & deforms too much.


Building Codes - It's the Law!

Don't say that the ACI standards do not apply to your locale.  The ACI Standards are incorporated DIRECTLY into the Uniform Building Code (IBC).  And every state (except Michigan) has adopted the IBC as their base building standard.

IBC 1901.2 states "Plain and reinforced concrete. Structural concrete shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and ACI 318..."

California has the CA Building Code, which is based on the IBC (as usual, CA just made their code more stringent).  A number of other states have done the same to meet regional issues (CO - wild fire protection, snow loads, FL - Hurricanes & Winds, Tidal Surge Areas, etc.).


Supporting the reinforcement


Contractors are NOT ALLOWED to place the reinforcement on the grade and "hook" it (lift the reinforcement into the slab with a hay hook) as they place the cement. After they lift the reinforcement to an arbitrary level, they walk through the wet cement, pushing the reinforcement back to the bottom - where it does absolutely NOTHING. Additionally, hooking frequently pierces the vapor barrier, rendering it worthless.

Concrete blocks or "chairs" must not be space so far apart, that they allow the reinforcing steel to deflect (bow or bend) during concrete placement or as the finishers walk on it. 

ACI 318-11 7.5.1 states "Reinforcing steel shall be accurately placed and adequately supported before concrete is placed, and shall be secured against displacement within tolerances..." 

IBC R506.2.4 states "Reinforcement support. Where provided in slabs on ground, reinforcement shall be supported to remain in place from the center to upper one third of the slab for the duration of the concrete placement."

Vapor Barriers


The plastic placed under a slab is known as a VAPOR RETARDER. It's sole purpose is to prevent capillary action (wicking of moisture) through the slab if it was allowed to remain in direct contact with the soil. Care must be taken to adequately overlap the plastic sheets, seal the seams with waterproof tape and prevent the plastic from punctures. 

Penetrations (pipes, conduits, vents, etc.) through the plastic sheet must be sealed with special cone shaped plastic sheets similar to roof jacks. Notice that the code said "retarder," not "preventer" or "barrier." Some will allow moisture transmission as they may decay over time.

Sand or soil is sometimes placed atop the plastic to absorb the bleed water on the bottom of the slab. The surface of slabs poured directly on plastic will bleed a lot surface water. The perimeter slabs must be elevated to account for the thickness of this material. The support chairs should sit on this material or be of an extended height to allow for it. 


In some areas of the country, these membranes perform multiple tasks, and are installed to also prevent methane or radon gas transmission into the living space. These membranes are made of special materials, require special seam treatments and incorporate under slab venting. Some systems utilize multiple layers of barriers to achieve the required protection.

IBC 2012 R506.2.3 states "Vapor retarder. A 6-mil (0.006 inch; 152 ï½Âµm) polyethylene or approved vapor retarder with joints lapped not less than 6 inches (152 mm) shall be placed between the concrete floor slab and the base course or the prepared subgrade where no base course exists.
Exception: The vapor retarder may be omitted:
1. From garages, utility buildings and other unheated accessory structures.
2. For unheated storage rooms having an area of less than 70 square feet (6.5 m2) and carports.
3. From driveways, walks, patios and other flatwork not likely to be enclosed and heated at a later date.
4. Where approved by the building official, based on local site conditions."


Proper Grading

The IBC also requires that the earth around the foundation fall away 6" in the first 10 feet, to promote positive site drainage away from the foundation. This also helps prevent water from flowing back under the slab, saturating the base material and causing wicking.


"Turndown" footings can also be added to a flat slab to reinforce the edges, transfer loads and to act as a "cut off wall" for ground water intrusion. These are already incorporated into building foundations as part of the designed load transfer.



Concrete Strength

Though the codes specify 2,500 PSI as the minimum strength for concrete foundations, there are significant benefits and little added cost from using 5000+ PSI concrete.  Added strength, durability,  wear resistance and reduced permeability are all achieved by merely increasing the strength.  Larger aggregates also increase the concrete strength. Most contractors utilize 3/8" aggregate in concrete, because the cost of pumping is a little lower.  3/4" rock is preferred (and is specified by most State Highway Departments), as it yields higher compressive strengths. A 3/4" aggregate and 5,000+ PSI mix and a 3/4" concrete pump is worth the return on your investment.  There is a significant return on the investment of a few thousand dollars.



Concrete Mix Design - Minimizing Water

Most contractors, pump operators and cement truck drivers do not understand "concrete science." 
Concrete only needs enough water to hydrate the cement particles.   

Water makes concrete weaker, by creating microscopic voids in the matrix of the concrete.  When the water evaporates, it leaves microscopic honeycombs behind - weakening the concrete.  

There are "water reducers," super plasticizers and other chemical admixes can reduce the ACTUAL water content required.  They increase the strength, while maintaining the flowability, pumpability and workability of the plastic concrete.  If your concrete contractor or ready-mix supplier does not know about these, find someone else (they have been around for decades!).

AND ABOVE ALL -

DO NOT let the concrete pump operator or cement truck driver add water when the truck arrives at the job site.  By adding water they just weaken your cement, adultering the formulation and mix design!  They are truck drivers and pump operators for a reason... because they are not engineers or concrete/building experts.

Your structural engineer or ready mix plant "mix master" should specify the mix design, based upon strength required, truck travel time, weather conditions, distance to pump & pump type, etc.  They can provide an "allowance" for the addition of some extra water, to be specified in measured gallons.

Paolo Benedetti Aquatic Artist, Watershape Consultant, Expert Witness 
"Creating water as art."™ 
Aquatic Technology Pool and Spa 
©www.aquatictechnology.com

Sunday, June 23, 2013

Swimming Pool Designer Expert Witness VGB Unblockable Drains

There has been a lot of confusion about VGB compliant BLOCKABLE & UNBLOCKABLE DRAIN COVERS.  

While the following national standards pertain to public/commercial pools, we advocate the same standards for residential vessels.  We do not discern a difference between the requirement for a safe hydraulic standards of private VS public/commercial vessels.  We feel that private pools should be just as safe as commercial pools when it comes to suction entrapment and safety.  After all, there are many more private pools than public pools on this planet!
 

While the MAXIMUM INDUSTRY STANDARDS allow 6 FPS, we advocate and promote a MAXIMUM SUCTION LINE VELOCITY OF 4 FPS IN THE TRUNK LINE and 2 FPS MAXIMUM THROUGH A BRANCH SUCTION LINE OR A DRAIN INLET (1 FPS when 1.5 FPS is the maximum standard).


First, let's start with an excerpt from a channel drain cover installation manaul:
 

WATER VELOCITY AND FLOW RATES -
The maximum water velocity through drain covers is limited by some local regulations, for example some state health departments limit the velocity through public pool drain covers to 1½ feet per second. This velocity limit is lower than the flow rating provided by the ANSI/APSP-16 2011 certification, therefore the local limit applies and must be followed. Never exceed the flow rating listed on the cover even if the local code does not provide a velocity limit.


PIPING – GENERAL
For new installations, the piping between drains must be sized to limit the velocity to six feet per second. This limit applies to the
branch piping and all fittings between multiple outlets and the tee leading back to the pump. If code requires a lower water velocity,
comply with the code. See the chart below for information on pipe size flow ratings at six feet per second.


HYDRAULIC SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS -


ACCEPTABLE PIPE SIZE FOR MAXIMUM RECOMMENDED SYSTEM FLOW RATE PER APSP-7 (6 feet/second in the branch line):
Pipe Size                    1½"  2"   2½"   3"   4"
Flow Rate in GPM    45    80   110   160  230 (rounded down)

This is where the confusion lies - blockable drains & un-blockable drains and the relationship of line velocities.

First, Blockable drains:
 

Though a drain cover may be rated for 10,000 GPM, it is REALLY limited by the MAXIMUM LINE VELOCITY of the attached pipes.  On dual drain systems, in the event one drain is blocked, the REMAINING lines must be capable of sustaining 100% of the flow BELOW the 6 FPS maximum.  This means, that during normal operation the flow rate through a "blockable drain" must be 3 FPS or less (when a drain becomes blocked the line velocity through the remaining drain will double). 

BLOCKABLE DRAIN EXAMPLES:

1)  A pump is connected to a 4" trunk line, which is split into (2) 3" branch lines. The 4" line flows 234 GPM @ 6 FPS, while the 3" branch line flows 68 GPM @ 3 FPS. 68 GPM X 2 = 136 GPM.  The maximum flow rate of that system is 136 GPM.  When one drain is blocked the maximum line velocity of the remaining 3" branch line is limited to 136 GPM - therefore that is the MAXIMUM to be drawn through the 4" trunk line.

2)  A pump is connected to a 4" trunk line, which is split into (2) 4" branch lines. The 4" line flows 234 GPM @ 6 FPS, while the 4" branch lines flows 117 GPM @ 3 FPS.  The maximum flow rate of that system is 234 GPM.  When one drain is blocked the maximum line velocity of the remaining 4" branch line is limited to 234 GPM @ 6 FPS - therefore that is the MAXIMUM that may also be drawn through the 4" trunk line as well.

To select a compliant cover, one would merely select a drain cover that is equal to or above the above GPM flow rate at 3 FPS.  If the local standard was 1.5 FPS through the cover, they you'd look for a cover with 2X the GPM flow rating of the above system maximums.
 

THEREFORE, for blockable drains, the maximum line velocity at the pipes connected directly below the cover are limited to 3 FPS maximum (or lower).  In communities with 1.5 FPS standards, the plumbing would have to be split again or upsized to get to 1.5 FPS.

Now, onto UNBLOCKABLE DRAINS:

They are rated using TWO CRITERIA: GPM @ FPS.
Most states limit the FPS flowrate through an UN-BLOCKABLE COVER TO 3 FPS. 
Some states (Texas for example) have lowered the FPS through un-blockable covers to 1.5 FPS.
The rating for an un-blockable cover will look like this: 300 GPM at 3 FPS.
So, if you draw 600 GPM through the cover, the line velocity would be 6 FPS - exceeding the rating of the cover.  150 GPM through the cover, would bring the line velocity down to 1.5 FPS (to comply with states that have de-rated such covers).
 

UN-BLOCKABLE DRAIN EXAMPLES:

1) An un-blockable channel drain is rated at 300 GPM @ 3 FPS.  It is connected to a 4" trunk line, that is split into (2) 2.5" branch lines.  The 2.5" branch lines are connect to 2 inlets on the bottom of the channel drain.
Consider the various maximum limits:
4" pipe: 234 GPM @ 6 FPS
2.5" pipe: 88 GPM @ 6 FPS
Un-blockable Drain Limit: 300 GPM @ 3 FPS
The line velocity of the attached 2.5" pipes are the limiting factors @ 88 GPM each X 2 = 176 GPM.
The maximum flowrate of this system is 176 GPM.

2) An un-blockable channel drain is rated at 300 GPM @ 3 FPS.  It is connected to a 4" trunk line & manifold, that is split into (3) 2.5" branch lines.  The 2.5" branch lines connect to 3 inlets on the bottom of the channel drain.
Consider the various maximum limits:
4" pipe: 234 GPM @ 6 FPS
2.5" pipe: 88 GPM @ 6 FPS
Un-blockable Drain Limit: 300 GPM @ 3 FPS
Though the line velocity of the (3) attached 2.5" pipes would allow 264 GPM (e.g. 88 GPM each X 3 = 264 GPM), that would exceed the maximum line velocity of the 4" trunk line at 234 GPM. 
The maximum flowrate of this system is 234 GPM @ 6 FPS.

3) An un-blockable channel drain is rated at 300 GPM @ 3 FPS.  It is connected to a 4" trunk line & manifold, that is split into (2) 2.5" branch lines.  The 2.5" branch lines connect to 2 inlets on the bottom of the channel drain.  However, the local authority's standard specifies 1.5 FPS for un-blockable drains.
Consider the various maximum limits:
4" pipe: 234 GPM @ 6 FPS
2.5" pipe: 88 GPM @ 6 FPS
Un-blockable Drain Limit: 150 GPM @ > 1.5 FPS < (a slower standard).
Though the line velocity of the (2) attached 2.5" pipes would allow 176 GPM (e.g. 88 GPM each X 2 = 176 GPM), that would exceed the maximum rating of the un-blockable cover at 1.5 FPS of 150 GPM. 
The maximum flowrate of this system is 150 GPM. 
Sidenote: the trunk line could not be downsized to 3", because 150 GPM would exceed 6 FPS in a 3" pipe.

4) An un-blockable channel drain is rated at 316 GPM @ 3.9 FPS when floor mounted.  It is connected to a 4" trunk line & manifold, that is split into (3) 2.5" branch lines.  The 2.5" branch lines connect to 3 inlets on the bottom of the channel drain.  However, the local authority's standard specifies 3 FPS for un-blockable drains (therefore, we must solve for the GPM rating at 3 FPS).
Consider the various maximum limits:
4" pipe: 234 GPM @ 6 FPS
2.5" pipe: 88 GPM @ 6 FPS
Un-blockable Drain Limit: XXX GPM @ > 3 FPS
316 GPM ÷ 3.9 FPS = 81 GPM/1 FPS
81 GPM X 3 GPM (our standard in this case) = 243 GPM @ 3 FPS
Though the line velocity of the (3) attached 2.5" pipes would allow 264 GPM (e.g. 88 GPM each X 3 = 264 GPM),
and the limit through the drain cover would allow 243 GPM @ 3 FPS,
BOTH OF THOSE FLOWRATES would exceed the maximum line velocity of the 4" trunk line at 234 GPM. 
Therefore, the maximum flowrate of this system is 234 GPM @ 6 FPS.
 

Note the differences in line velocities of the piping attached to bloackable VS un-blockable drains:

Blockable Covers: 

The maximum line velocity at the pipe connected below the cover is limited to 3 FPS.
Un-blockable Covers: 

The maximum line velocity at the pipe connected below the cover is limited to 6 FPS.

While these are the MAXIMUM INDUSTRY STANDARDS, we advocate and promote a MAXIMUM LINE VELOCITY OF 4 FPS IN THE TRUNK LINE and 2 FPS MAXIMUM THROUGH A BRANCH LINE OR A DRAIN INLET (1 FPS when 1.5 FPS is the maximum).
 

Hopefully, through these examples, you have come to realize that JUST BECAUSE A COVER HAS A MANUFACTURER'S "FLOW RATING," it is the ATTACHED PIPING SYSTEM THAT DICTATES the MAXIMUM GPM through a plumbing system.
 

Paolo Benedetti 
Aquatic Artist, Watershape Consultant, Expert Witness 
"Creating water as art."™ 
Aquatic Technology Pool and Spa 
©www.aquatictechnology.com

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Swimming Pool Designs must be ADA Compliant

Expert Witness - Swimming Pool & Spa, Americans with Disabilities Act

The ADA requires that swimming pools be designed to allow a person with disabilities to enter and exit the swimming pool or spa, on their own and without the assistance of others.

This is easily achieved through the installation of a lift.  Lifts are electric, hydraulic or battery powered.  They must be in place and available for use at all times.  They are UGLY and can potentially become an obstruction on the pool deck, in violation of other portions of the ADA.

The alternative is an innovative design, that allows the person with disabilities to walk or roll right into the water.  It is a ramp or beach entry, that gently slopes into the water.  This is aesthetically pleasing and a creative solution to the hideous deck mounted chair or sling lifts.

 
Paolo Benedetti 
Aquatic Artist, Watershape Consultant, Expert Witness 
"Creating water as art."™ 
Aquatic Technology Pool and Spa 
©www.aquatictechnology.com

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

International Swimming Pool Designer and Builder

Swimming Pool Design and Construction Plans - What needs to be included in a BASIC set of plans?

Minimum Inclusions:
Scaled Site Plan 
Erosion Control Plan (Storm, Waste Water and Run-off Control Plan - Federal Requirements: http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/const.cfm )
Grading Plan
Drainage Plan
Soils Report
Structural Engineering
Soils Engineer Approval Letter (review of structural engineering)
Project Layout
Project Cross Sections  (depths, stairs, ramps, etc).
Plumbing Schematics 
Hydraulic Calculations (line sizes, velocities & flow rates) 
Equipment Model and Part Numbers
Lighting Schematics
High Voltage Electrical Schematics (site & equipment pad)
Low Voltage Electrical Schematics (data, automation, temperature sensors, etc). 
Spa Seating Elevations & Jets Layout/Elevations
Design Details (plan & section views)
Equipment Pad/Room Layout (to scale)
Equipment Room Electrical (high & low voltage)
Materials List (major components)
Construction Specifications
Applicable Codes and Standards

Optional:
Finish Materials (Stone, tile, plaster, stucco, wood, etc.)
Materials Specifications
Installation Mock-ups & Samples
Installation Procedures
Workmanship Standards
Shop Drawings for Custom Fabricated Components
Gray Water Storage and Recycling

Gone are the days when a pool could be built with 2 pages of plans - a site plan and one page of generic mail-order structural engineering. 

Paolo Benedetti 
Aquatic Artist, Watershape Consultant, Expert Witness 
"Creating water as art."™ 
Aquatic Technology Pool and Spa 
©www.aquatictechnology.com